Editorial decisions rest on scientific merit and are independent of
article charges, membership and any optional service.
- Peer review
- Single-blind. Manuscripts that proceed to external peer review are normally evaluated
by at least two independent ophthalmology specialists.
- Reviewer selection
- The handling editor assigns reviewers by subspecialty — anterior segment,
glaucoma, retina, neuro-ophthalmology, pediatric ophthalmology or oculoplastics —
and screens them for conflicts of interest before assignment.
- Decision
- Review timing depends on the manuscript, reviewer availability and any ethics or
integrity questions. Decisions may invite revision, accept or reject the manuscript.
- Measured record
- Across the 42 articles published to date, the median interval
from submission to acceptance was 41 days
(interquartile range 23–98). Acceptance
follows revision, so this is longer than a first decision.
- Research ethics
- Studies in human participants must comply with the Declaration of Helsinki and carry
institutional review board approval. Animal work follows the ARVO Statement for the Use
of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. Prospective interventional trials must be
be registered in an accepted public registry at or before the first participant
provides consent for enrollment.
- Patient privacy in ophthalmic images
- Identifiable ophthalmic, periocular or facial images and case details require written
consent for publication. Authors must remove unnecessary identifiers and follow the
approved privacy and publication-consent policy for every image type.
- Reporting standards
- CONSORT for randomized trials, STROBE for observational studies, STARD for diagnostic
accuracy and the CARE checklist for case reports.
- Originality and data
- All submissions are screened with iThenticate, including for substantial overlap with
the authors' own prior work. A data availability statement is required for every
empirical manuscript.
- Governance
- The journal follows COPE and ICMJE guidance on authorship, conflicts of interest,
corrections and retractions. Editors and reviewers recuse themselves where objectivity
could be compromised.
- Copyright and reuse
- Authors retain copyright. Every article is published under Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 and may be self-archived without embargo.