Resources for IJN Editors
Practical tools, guidance, and policy references that help editors manage reviews efficiently and uphold publication integrity.
Journal Metrics
Consistent, transparent publishing metrics help authors plan submissions and track impact. The following benchmarks are applied across the International Journal of Nutrition.
Journal At a Glance
International Journal of Nutrition is a peer reviewed, open access journal focused on clinical nutrition, public health nutrition, dietary assessment, and food science. The journal emphasizes transparent methods, data availability, and rapid dissemination for real world impact.
- ISSN: 2379-7835
- Open access publishing model
- DOI assigned to every article
- Global readership and indexing distribution
Core Resources
Decision Templates
Structured decision letters to ensure consistent reviewer feedback and outcomes.
Reviewer Guidance
Standard review criteria and checklists for nutrition research.
Ethics References
Policies covering conflicts, authorship, and data integrity.
Communication Tools
Invitation language and response templates to keep reviewers engaged.
Editorial Workflow Support
Editors receive support with reviewer selection, reminders, and manuscript tracking. This reduces administrative work and keeps decisions on schedule.
- Reviewer recommendation support from the editorial office
- Access to manuscript history and revision tracking
- Clear escalation path for ethics or conflict issues
Quality Standards
Resources are aligned with IJN editorial policies so decisions are consistent and defensible. Editors are encouraged to document key considerations in each decision letter.
- Focus on methodological rigor and transparent reporting
- Confirm data availability and ethical approval statements
- Encourage clear presentation of limitations and implications
Ongoing Development
IJN provides periodic updates on editorial policies, reporting standards, and reviewer best practices. Editors are encouraged to participate in training and policy discussions that improve quality.
Updates include guidance on new reporting standards and emerging nutrition methodologies.
Editors receive advance notice when policy updates are planned.
Editorial Communication
Effective communication improves author experience and reduces revision cycles. IJN provides guidance on clear decision letters and constructive feedback.
- Decision letter templates with tone guidance
- Examples of clear revision requests
- Suggested language for ethical concerns
- Tips for summarizing reviewer feedback consistently
Clear tone reduces misunderstandings and speeds revisions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are resources updated regularly?
Yes. Policies and templates are reviewed and updated as standards evolve.
How do I request reviewer support?
Email the editorial office for reviewer suggestions.
Do editors receive training?
Yes. Onboarding materials and guidance are provided.
Can I suggest improvements?
Yes. Editor feedback is welcomed and reviewed by leadership.
